A Win for Mesothelioma Victims – Pennsylvania Supreme Court Restores Employee Rights
In December 2013, the Nemeroff Law Firm won a major victory for victims of mesothelioma and other latent occupational diseases in Pennsylvania by restoring their legal right to seek compensation for their injuries from their employers.
In the consolidated case of Tooey v. A.K. Steel, et al. and Landis v. A. W. Chesterton, et al., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recognized an employee’s right to bring a civil action against an employer for a latent occupational disease, ruling that employers could not use the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”) to deny workers the opportunity to obtain compensation. Under the Act, compensation from an employer was only available if the occupational disease manifested within 300 weeks of the date of last exposure to an occupational toxin.
This ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court represents a major shift in Pennsylvania law in favor of an injured employee and the significance of this decision should be clear to anyone who understands a disease like mesothelioma, which can take decades to manifest but mere months to claim the lives of its victims. Prior to this decision, employees diagnosed with mesothelioma, or other latent occupational diseases, had no chance for relief from the employers that had exposed them to asbestos or other occupational toxins. This opinion goes a long way toward protecting the rights of employees and their families who have suffered from negligence or wrongdoing by an employer.
John Tooey worked as an industrial salesman from 1964 until 1982 and during his employment sold asbestos containing products, which caused him to be exposed to asbestos dust. In December 2007, Tooey developed mesothelioma and died less than one year later. Spurgeon Landis worked for a manufacturer of welding rods from 1946 until 1992 and, during his employment was exposed to asbestos dust. Mr. Landis was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2007 and died in 2012. Under prior interpretations of the Workers’ Compensation Act in Pennsylvania, neither plaintiff could seek workers compensation benefits or file civil action against their employer, because their mesothelioma did not manifest within 300 weeks of the date of last exposure.
To reverse years of precedent and succeed where other plaintiffs had failed, The Nemeroff Law Firm decided to take the case to the state Supreme Court, arguing that latent occupational diseases, such as mesothelioma, were outside the jurisdiction of the Act and that the Act’s provisions, when applied to these cases, were unconstitutional. Nemeroff was able to prevail relying on Lord Corp. v. Pollard, 548 Pa. 124, 695 A.2d 767 (1997), Boniecke v. McGraw Edison Co., 485 Pa. 163, 401 A.2d 345 (1979) and Greer v. U.S. Steel Corp., 475 Pa. 448, 380 A.2d 1221 (1997). In each of these cases, the employees’ civil action would survive the exclusivity provision if it was determined the injury was not compensable.
The Court ultimately agreed, ruling that the Act did not apply to latent occupational diseases, or diseases that might take years to develop and be diagnosed, and therefore victims were not prohibited from filing a common law claim against an employer. In its written opinion, the Court stated that previous interpretation of the Act would leave “the employee with no remedy against his or her employer, a consequence that clearly contravenes the Act’s intended purpose of benefitting the injured worker.”
The Court went on to state that the Act does not apply to latent occupational disease claims because it is “inconceivable that the legislature, in enacting a statute specifically designed to benefit employees, intended to leave a certain class of employees which have suffered the most serious of work-related injuries without any redress under the Act or at common law.”
After all, while manufacturers and suppliers of harmful toxins bear their share of responsibility in these cases, an employer is the last line of defense for an employee and is obligated to provide a safe work environment. In this landmark decision, the court ruled that interpretations should be “consistent with the humanitarian purposes of the Act,” and “resolve in favor of the employee.”
The implications of this decision cannot be overstated, as it reverberates well beyond these two unfortunate victims. While the ruling was based on the occupational disease mesothelioma, there is nothing in the Court’s reasoning to indicate that employers will be shielded from providing compensation for other occupational diseases with long latency periods. Other latent cancers, such as benzene-induced leukemia, should fall within the Court’s decision as long as the occupational disease first manifests more than 300 weeks from the date of last exposure to the industrial toxin.
It’s very rare as an attorney to have an opportunity to make or change the law, and even more rare to right a wrong for a class of victims and their families who have suffered so greatly. And while neither client lived to see the results of their appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision does bring some measure of justice to their families and to the families of other unfortunate employees who suffered from occupational diseases that did not develop until years after toxic exposure had ended.
We can only hope that this humanitarian decision in Pennsylvania will influence other states to take action to protect the rights of those have suffered due to employer neglect or misconduct.
Editor’s Note: The appeal in the case of Tooey v. A.K. Steel, et al. and Landis v. A. W. Chesterton, et al. was briefed by Roderick S. Marshall of The Nemeroff Law Firm and Brent M. Rosenthal of The Law Offices of Brent Rosenthal, and argued by Robert F. Daley of Robert N. Peirce & Associates.
Rick Nemeroff has consistently proven to his adversaries what can happen when they square off with Rick in court. Rick fights for individuals and families who have been harmed by indifferent corporations. He is a dedicated attorney, and his clients know that they will be represented by a professional who combines compassion and caring with […]Read More Information
R. Scott Marshall
Several years ago, Scott moved across the country for the opportunity to join the Nemeroff Law Firm and represent individuals and their families whose lives have been devastated by mesothelioma. It continues to be a gratifying experience each and every day, as he and other attorneys from the firm do their best to provide counsel […]Read More Information
Jennifer loves to win and loves to be on the right side of an argument – giving asbestos victims a voice provides her the opportunity to do both. She derives great satisfaction from helping clients of the Nemeroff Law Firm, and she is dedicated to translating her life-long passion for empowering victims into winning results. […]Read More Information
Carla comes from a typical, hardworking, blue-collar family. Her biggest inspiration–her parents–are in their 70’s and continue to work every day, operating a mom and pop tire store in Pittsburgh, PA. As a lawyer, she wanted to advance the rights of hard working folks just like her parents. When Carla first began working with asbestos-harmed […]Read More Information
Jeffrey A. O’Connell
Attorney Jeffrey O’Connell has devoted his entire legal career to helping people with diseases caused by toxic substances, including asbestos, and is an important part of the Nemeroff Law Firm’s national toxic tort practice. Jeff is an integral part of the litigation team that handles discovery and prepares these complex cases for trial, a role […]Read More Information
Barrett Naman Barrett Naman visit superlawyers.com> Barrett dedicates his practice to working for victims of injustice and fighting corporate entities that value profits over the health and safety of people. His belief that all victims deserve the best and most focused representation drives him to aggressively fight for his clients. Born and raised in Beaumont, […]Read More Information
D. Carl Money has spent his entire legal career fighting on behalf of workers and their families. After law school, he worked as a general counsel in the Texas Legislature where he developed and directed legislative agendas that ensured access to justice for individuals wronged by corporate corruption. For most of the past sixteen years, […]Read More Information
Prior to graduating from law school, Ryan spent four summers as a law clerk with the Nemeroff Law Firm. During that time, he gained valuable practical experience and witnessed first-hand the life changing results that the firm is capable of delivering. After graduating from college, he attended law school on a large academic scholarship. He […]Read More Information
Sidney has 25 years of legal experience working in law firms focused on personal injury and toxic tort litigation. In practice, Sidney has litigated a vast array of cases involving personal injury, asbestos related diseases, complex business litigation and employment discrimination claims. Courage and compassion best describe Sidney’s persona as she is a born fighter […]Read More Information
Ellen A. Presby
When Ellen A. Presby is faced with the life-altering ramifications of personal injury, it is vital to have knowledgeable and dedicated legal representation such as that provided by Ellen. With more than three decades of litigation experience, Presby serves as a lead attorney for personal injury, products liability and pharmaceutical cases. Attuned to her client’s […]Read More Information